EyeFortin-Reviews.com is an independent publication that researches and reviews eye-health supplements. We are not the manufacturer, the distributor, the official store or an authorised agent for EyeFortin. We do not sell any product and we cannot process orders or refunds.
We exist because the information available about products in this category is poor. Search for almost any supplement and you will find dozens of pages that repeat the marketing, invent ingredient lists, and display star ratings nobody can verify. We do the opposite: we read the label, transcribe it, trace each ingredient to published research, check the pricing and the refund terms, and write down what we can and cannot establish.
What we do
- Transcribe labels verbatim, including warnings the marketing omits.
- Grade evidence for each ingredient separately from the product.
- Publish pricing and refund terms as we find them, with the date we checked.
- Say “unknown” when something cannot be verified, rather than filling the gap.
- Correct errors and date the correction.
What we are not
We are not a medical resource, and nothing here is medical advice. We do not diagnose, treat or advise on individual cases. We do not have a named medical reviewer, and we will not invent one — our evidence policy explains how we handle that limitation.
We are also not impartial in the commercial sense: some links on this site are affiliate links, which is how the research is funded. We disclose that on every page footer and in full on the affiliate disclosure page. It does not buy a favourable conclusion — if anything, our review of the product this site is named after concludes that its marketing outruns its evidence.
How we are funded
Affiliate commissions and nothing else. No manufacturer pays us for coverage, supplies products, or reviews drafts. No brand has editorial input. If that ever changes, the change will be disclosed prominently before it happens.
Editorial team
Written and edited by the EyeFortin-Reviews.com editorial team. We publish under a team byline rather than individual names because our process is collaborative: one researcher gathers sources, a second checks every factual claim against the label and the cited papers, and an editor reviews for clarity and balance. Our editorial policy sets out the workflow in detail.
Contact
Corrections and questions are welcome — see the contact page. If you believe a factual claim on this site is wrong, tell us which claim and which source contradicts it, and we will investigate and correct or explain.